Archive for March, 2007

What Did Karl Barth Believe About Matter?

Monday, March 26th, 2007

Starting at the bottom of page 280 ["The Epistle to the Romans", Oxford University Press paperback, 1968], we read: What is human and worldly and historical and ‘natural’ is shown to be what it veritably is in its relation to God the Creator — only a transparent thing, only an image, only a sign, only [...]

An Ugly Retreat

Monday, March 19th, 2007

Even an armchair historian can tell you that a good general prepares for his retreat as soon as he sees the need for it. He tries to arrange an orderly retreat to minimize casualties and loss of equipment and other materiel. He knows not to try to hold ground which is indefensible, being well aware [...]

Why Do We Need to Speak As-if?

Thursday, March 15th, 2007

As-if is a strange and wonderful language that we all speak inside our normal language — whether English or French or Japanese. Even an Enlightenment rationalist like Adam Smith spoke of the Invisible Hand when he found himself not able to speak directly about what might now be called a self-organizing system. This is not [...]

God as Other — What Was Karl Barth Up To?: Part 1.

Tuesday, March 13th, 2007

I’ve been reading Karl Barth’s Epistle to the Romans, a book surprisingly oft-read decades ago. [For the scholars out there, I'm using the paperback edition published by Oxford University Press in 1968.] Barth’s writing and thinking style is still more discursive than mine, and he is probably still more intense than I am at my [...]

The Christian in the Universe of Einstein: 6. Using the Techniques of Negative Theology in Physics and Metaphysics

Friday, March 9th, 2007

I’ve argued that the human mind is shaped by its immediate environments, including social relationships starting with that between infant and mother. From there, we expand out into larger sections of those immediate environments and may begin to interact with other environments. In this expansion into other environments, we’re like other opportunistic animals — bears [...]

Defining Principalities, Powers, and Invisible Hands: Still Preliminary

Monday, March 5th, 2007

I’ve been thinking about Principalities, Powers, and Invisible Hands for a good decade or so, not every day but often. My academic background is in mathematics and I’ve read fairly broadly in ‘chaos theory’ and related specialities. I’ve even read some of the works of John Casti and Stuart Kaufmann, two experts in self-organizing systems. [...]