http://loydfueston.com/?p=112 Updating Thomistic Existentialism Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:27:14 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://loydfueston.com/?p=112&cpage=1#comment-5721 Acts of Being » Blog Archive » Wrongful Formation of Minds: William James and the Loss of a World Sat, 16 May 2009 17:30:00 +0000 http://loydfueston.com/?p=112#comment-5721 [...] the good and bad in pragmatism as developed by William James and his followers in these articles: What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and What is Mind?: More on Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism. Explore posts in the same [...] [...] the good and bad in pragmatism as developed by William James and his followers in these articles: What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and What is Mind?: More on Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism. Explore posts in the same [...]

]]> http://loydfueston.com/?p=112&cpage=1#comment-4907 Acts of Being » Blog Archive » Ways of Thought in the Modern West Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:55:21 +0000 http://loydfueston.com/?p=112#comment-4907 [...] From this point on, I’ll assume my updated understanding of Thomistic existentialism, which was itself a great expansion and ‘updating’ of the moderate realism developed by pre-Thomistic thinkers such as St. Augustine of Hippo. Unless I refer directly to Professor Quigley, the claims and analyses are my own. I’ll also note that I’ve claimed in earlier entries that Jamesian pragmatism shares some important elements with Thomism or — more generally, moderate realism — in that knowledge is properly acquired from sensory data but the building up to greater structures can’t proceed properly because no such structures, such as the ultimate of a world, are assumed even tentatively. (See What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism.) [...] [...] From this point on, I’ll assume my updated understanding of Thomistic existentialism, which was itself a great expansion and ‘updating’ of the moderate realism developed by pre-Thomistic thinkers such as St. Augustine of Hippo. Unless I refer directly to Professor Quigley, the claims and analyses are my own. I’ll also note that I’ve claimed in earlier entries that Jamesian pragmatism shares some important elements with Thomism or — more generally, moderate realism — in that knowledge is properly acquired from sensory data but the building up to greater structures can’t proceed properly because no such structures, such as the ultimate of a world, are assumed even tentatively. (See What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism.) [...]

]]> http://loydfueston.com/?p=112&cpage=1#comment-3320 Acts of Being » Blog Archive » A Truer and More Honest Natural Law Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:12:13 +0000 http://loydfueston.com/?p=112#comment-3320 [...] of the most highly regarded brain scientists of our era has endorsed those Thomistic teachings. See What is Mind: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and succeeding parts in that series for my review of Walter J. Freeman’s How Brains Make Up [...] [...] of the most highly regarded brain scientists of our era has endorsed those Thomistic teachings. See What is Mind: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and succeeding parts in that series for my review of Walter J. Freeman’s How Brains Make Up [...]

]]> http://loydfueston.com/?p=112&cpage=1#comment-1966 A Thomistic Take on Madness and Modernism « To See a World in a Grain of Sand Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:30:59 +0000 http://loydfueston.com/?p=112#comment-1966 [...] Their Minds by the brain-scientist and ‘Thomistic-pragmatist’ Walter J. Freeman. (See What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and other blog entries on that site with the major title: What is Mind?.) In retrospect, I can see [...] [...] Their Minds by the brain-scientist and ‘Thomistic-pragmatist’ Walter J. Freeman. (See What is Mind?: Pragmatism and Thomistic Existentialism and other blog entries on that site with the major title: What is Mind?.) In retrospect, I can see [...]

]]>